University of Central Florida (UCF) HSC4501 Epidemiology of chronic diseases Exam 1 Practice

Session length

1 / 20

Why is it dangerous to infer causality from cross-sectional associations?

Temporality is unknown; observed associations may be due to reverse causation or confounding.

In a cross-sectional study you measure exposure and disease at one point in time, so you don’t know which came first. That lack of temporality means the observed association could be due to the exposure leading to disease, or reverse causation where having the disease changes exposure status, or a third variable (confounder) that is linked to both. Because you can’t establish the sequence of events, you can’t infer causality from the association alone. Longitudinal designs, where exposure is assessed before outcomes develop, are needed to support causal inferences. Cross-sectional studies can reveal associations and generate hypotheses, but they don’t prove cause and effect.

Cross-sectional studies establish temporality.

They measure only incidence, not prevalence.

They inherently randomize exposure.

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy